Azure Storage Partition Names
If you are using Azure Blob Storage and have a heavy workload, here's something you can do to improve performance that the majority of people are not doing - pay attention to the name you use for an Azure storage account.
A whitepaper released in 2011 describes the internals of how Azure Storage works under the hood. It describes how the partitioning layer uses a range-based partitioning scheme to scale and load balance the storage system. Using the range-based scheme makes sense in a multi-tenant world. Objects are now stored within a set of ranges and can help isolate bad neighbor effect. A hash-based system would help spread out the load, but then you lose the performance gain of ranges and the bad-neighbor effect is now more profound across a set of nodes, instead of potentially a smaller group.
If you create multiple storage accounts in an Azure
Resource Manager template, you normally see some kind of storage account
prefix parameter that is consumed during the storage account creation process.
Here is an example of this:
"[concat(parameters('storageAccount'), copyindex())]" , which returns this output: myStorage0, myStorage1, myStorage2, etc. Here is another example that shows hashing the resource group name by using the function uniqueString
"[concat(uniquestring(resourceGroup().id), 'standardsa')]". This
creates a hash based on the resourceGroup id and concatenate standardsa to
it, but it would be the same prefix hash, not randomly-generated names. The prefixes generated could potentially put the partitions on the same partition server due to the sequential naming.
A potentially performance impact occurs when the storage location service decides to
rebalance the partition ranges to different partition servers. This rebalancing operation causes latency of
storage calls. However, if you create a way distribute writes across multiple
partition servers using a non sequential naming pattern, you can scale our performance linearly with load.
How can you generate unique names that are not following a prefix pattern? This is a good question. Researching what ARM template functions exist, I was surprised there was nothing on generating a random name. There have been requests to Microsoft for providing this functionality, but these suggestions were turned down.
Talking with a peer, Alex Campos, from our Rackspace Azure team, I learned that he wrote a generic storage template that answers the question of how to generate a unique name. There is a function available in an ARM template called uniqueString which will generate a hash based on the objects passed in. In my ARM template, I create two storage accounts for each VM in my copy loop: PremiumLRS and StandardLRS storage account types.
'cd', string(copyindex())) ,0,10), 'cd', copyIndex())]",
deployment().name, string(copyIndex())) ,0,10), 'cd',
For the first storage account, I generate a hash based on the subscription id, resourcegroup id, a string called 'cd', and the current integer of my index loop. I then concatenate the hash, 'cd', and the current integer of my index loop. With the second storage account, I add the deployment name to my hash function. I want my hash to be unique, so it must differ from the uniqueString call that I did previously. I also now add 'ssd' to the end of my storage account name since this is being used to generate my premium_lrs storage and will help me identify it.
The output generates the following messages:
15:20:57 - [VERBOSE] 3:20:57 PM - Resource Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts 'tnisayz3qdcd0' provisioning status is running
15:20:57 - [VERBOSE] 3:20:57 PM - Resource Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts 'hi4fn4pgjccd1' provisioning status is running
15:21:22 - [VERBOSE] 3:21:22 PM - Resource Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts 'v4pfo5nwdkcd0ssd' provisioning status is succeeded
15:21:28 - [VERBOSE] 3:21:28 PM - Resource Microsoft.Storage/storageAccounts 'a725b73hpkcd1ssd' provisioning status is succeeded
Using the examples above, the partition map which tracks the index range partitions, intially may have had mystorage0, mystorage1, mystorage2 on partition server 1. With my modified code to generate a unique prefix hash, the partitions now should be spread out on multiple partition servers since I did not follow a sequential naming pattern.